Different Indirect Tax Systems In The World

Dmitry Kaglik

March 18, 2013

SAP

6 Comments

Share the knowledge!

Where do you live?

Russia? Germany? United Kingdom? Australia? If yes, then you are very likely to understand the words “sales tax” differently from people whose answer is “United States” or “Canada”.

The reason is that the US (and Canadian) taxation system is very different from that used all over the rest of the world.

Let me show you an example with 3 parties involved.

A mining company produces ore, which is then transformed into a car by a manufacturer. The car is sold to an end user.

What happens in this case, say, in Germany?

The schema of VAT paymentThe mining company sells ore for the price and adds the Value Added Tax on top of it. This VAT is paid to the state.

The manufacturer buys ore and pays to the mining company both the cost price and VAT. Then he sells the car to the end user and charges the car price and VAT on it. As a result, the manufacturer pays the VAT amount to the state, but before that he deducts the amount of VAT already paid to the mining company.

The state receives payments from both the mining company and the manufacturer.

Of course, the end user is the one who actually pays both parts of this VAT.

And now let’s move our scenario to United States.

The schema of sales tax paymentThere is no VAT in the USA. This country uses Sales Tax instead. Sales tax is charged only on the final sale to an end user.

The transaction between the mining company and the manufacturer does not involve any tax at all. The full amount of sales tax is taken from the transaction between the manufacturer and the end user.

The state receives the payment only from one part.

And, again, this is the end user to finance all the taxes.

So, what is the point? The American model uses less parties involved in the relationship with the state. It is easier to control to some extent. US IRS (Internal Revenue System) is not interested in the relationships between the manufacturer and the mining company. It only controls the last part of the chain.

But what happens if the manufacturer decided not to use the ore for manufacturing purposes, but use it for some internal consumption? Here comes the second part of the Sales Tax, its brother the Use Tax. In this case the manufacturer should itself evaluate the amount of self-consumed goods, calculate Use Tax and pay it to the state. Again, if the mining company does not self-consume anything, it does not need to report to IRS at all.

You see, up until this point the American Sales Tax system looks much simpler than he VAT-based system. But still American taxation is understood to be the most difficult in the world. Why? We’ll talk about this separately. Stay subscribed!

Do you have additional questions? Maybe you need our help? Feel free to contact SAP Expert!

Share the knowledge!

Related Posts

Controlling Account Assignment for non-Financial consultants

One of the most common issues that users experience when trying to post a document into the Accounting module of SAP is the issue about Assignment of Controlling Object. This error may appear in different situations: manual entry of the document in Finance, Goods Receipt or Service Entry Sheet for a Purchase Order, and so […]

Read More

An offer from SAP Expert for those in job search

Are you in the job search? Do you want some help? SAP Expert wants to give you a helping hand. There are actually two parts of this help. First of all, I am offering you an impartial  CV / Resume review. Seeing many of them, writing my own, I have some views on what should […]

Read More

Search this site

SAP Expert on the web

Subscribe!

Enter your email address:

Polls

Will you be happy to pay for the 3rd edition of the book FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS ON SAP FINANCE?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
Visit Us On TwitterVisit Us On LinkedinCheck Our Feed